Legal Opinion

United States v. David Vyner

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 27, 2017No. 14-3091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

On appeal from his conviction upon entering a guilty plea to violating 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a), David Vyner contends that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution. Section 1546(a) penalizes the knowing possession of an altered document prescribed by statute or regulation for entry into the United States. Vyner admitted he knowingly possessed an altered foreign passport but contends that Section 1546(a) covers only documents issued by the United States, not by foreign governments. Alternatively, even if…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Premo v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kervinton Valentino v. Harold ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Yonas EshetuCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Azam DoostCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
  4. Thompson v. MillerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
  5. United States v. HicksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API