Legal Opinion
State v. Kuhuke
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Wilson District Court. Prosecution by The State against Kuhuke, for an alleged violation of § 3 of the dramshop act. Trial at the September Term, 1880, of the district court, and verdict and judgment against Kuhuke, who appeals. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was a criminal prosecution under §3 of the dramshop act of 1868, (Comp. Laws 1879, p. 386.) Said §3, so far as it is necessary to quote it, reads as follows:
“Sec. 3. Any person, without taking out and having a license as grocer, dramshop keeper or tavern keeper, who shall, directly or indirectly, sell any spirituous, vinous or fermented or other intoxicating liquors, shall be fined in any sum not more than one hundred dollars for each offense.”
The complaint reads as follows:
*406“State oe Kansas, County oe Wilson, ss.
“ M. L. Moody, on his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goodwin v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Conyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Horne v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1862
- State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SchweiterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DycheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Wistrand v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1898
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901