Legal Opinion

Smith v. Manson

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

Appellant Thomas C. Smith, III appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County that denied Smith’s motion for post-trial relief from the court’s order granting the City of Pittsburgh’s (City) motion for directed verdict. The issue presented in this case is whether a dangerous condition in the curb along a street may result in the imposition of liability on a local agency under Section 8542(b)(6) of the act commonly known as the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (Tort Claims Act), as amended, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b)(6).

This litigation arises…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Snyder v. HarmonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. KILEY BY KILEY v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Lockwood v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Montgomery v. Bazaz-SehgalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Page v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Weiss v. Williamsport Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. York Newspapers, Inc. v. City of YorkCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API