Legal Opinion
Shields v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided November 18, 2002No. 6:02-cv-00577PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S MOTION TO STAY AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
SCHELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on “Defendant Ford Motor Company’s Motion to Stay” filed on September 9, 2002 (Dkt.# 6) (Memorandum in support, dkt. # 7). Plaintiff responded on September 24, 2002 (Dkt.# 11). Defendant filed a reply on October 1, 2002 (Dkt.# 12). A sur-reply was filed by Plaintiff on October 10, 2002 (Dkt.# 16). In order to decide the motion to stay, the court must consider the issues raised by “Plaintiffs Motion to Remand” filed on September…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Curtis v. BP America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Betts v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2006
- Conroy v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Interstate Service Provider, Inc. v. JordanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
- JOYCE v. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.