Legal Opinion
Nehmer v. United States Veterans' Administration
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 15, 1989No. Civ. A. C 86-6160 TEHPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. After careful and extensive consideration of the parties’ lengthy briefs and oral arguments of counsel, the Court hereby grants summary judgment in part to plaintiffs and summary judgment in part to defendants. The Court finds that defendants failed to comply with the Veterans’ Dioxin and Radiation Exposure Compensation Standards Act, 38 U.S.C. § 354 note (hereinafter “Dioxin Act” or “Act”) by erroneously interpreting two provisions of the Act. As a result, a portion of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Seattle Audubon Society v. LyonsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Haas v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Nehmer v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Williams v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Jonathan L. Haas v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.