Legal Opinion
Alexander A. Stratienko, M.D. v. Cordis Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 18, 2005No. 04-6349PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Dr. Alexander Stratienko, who created a catheter device and shared his design for that device with Defendant Cor-dis Corporation, brought this federal diversity suit against Cordis for misappropriation of a trade secret, wrongful benefit, and breach of contract. The district court granted summary judgment to Cordis, and Dr. Stratienko appeals. He challenges (1) the district court’s reliance on self-interested declarations of Cordis employees, (2) the district court’s determination that circumstantial evidence can never create a genuine issue of material fact in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun ThanooCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Andrea Gogel v. KIA Motors Manufacturing of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Mike's Train House, Inc. v. Lionel, L.L.C., Korea Brass and Yoo Chan YangCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Honeywell International, Inc. v. ITT Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Dennis v. Osram Sylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.