Legal Opinion

Jones v. Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 14, 1949No. 16,069PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIS is an action in the nature of mandamus. The parties appear in this court in the same order as in the trial court. We hereinafter refer to them as petitioners and respondents.

Petitioners were, on January 6, 1947, the owners of real estate commonly known as 1011 Pennsylvania street in Denver, and on that date applied to the respondent Lyle D. Webber, at that time Chief Building Inspector for the City and County of Denver, for a permit to remodel the building on the premises in order that the same might be converted into a "small real estate office." The respondent building inspector denied…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Seeley v. MaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  2. People v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  3. People ex rel. Park Reservoir Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  4. General Reduction Co. v. TharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Padrick v. Kiser Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Livingston v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Humana, Inc. v. BOARD OF ADJUST. OF CITY OF LAKEWOODSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  4. Mosgrove v. Town of Federal HeightsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Carleno Coal Sales, Inc. v. Ramsay Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1954

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API