Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Griswold

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1883PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is an action on a recognizance given under the Gen. Sts. c. 124, § 10. The defendants allege that the arrest on which the principal defendant was brought before the magistrate who took the recognizance was unlawful, and that therefore the recognizance is void. The main point relied on in support of this contention is that no sufficient notice to appear for examination was given to the principal defendant under the St. of 1877, o. 250, § 1. By that statute, “Such notice may be served by ... . leaving the same at his last and usual place of abode not less than three days before the time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Manuel v. BatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cloverdale Homes v. Town of CloverdaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. United Drug Co. v. CordleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. City of St. Charles v. StookeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Bay State Wholesale Drug Co. v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Ryan v. DiPaoloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API