Legal Opinion

Marcus v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1948No. 31875PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is a well-established rule in this State that, when a motion for a new trial is based on the general grounds, and there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict and it has been approved by the trial judge, such judgment will not be interfered with by this court. See Pafford v. State, 35 Ga. App. 255 (132 S. E. 781); Foster v. State, 43 Ga. App. 427 (159 S. E. 141); Butler v. State, 47 Ga. App. 305 (170 S. E. 382); Brown v. State, 154 Ga. 54 (113 S. E. 161). The verdict of the jury in the instant case is supported by the evidence. It has the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. John v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
  3. McDonald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Poole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stanley v. SquadritoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Price v. Whitley Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Hight v. SteelyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API