Legal Opinion

Hight v. Steely

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 1952No. 33988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The record in this case presents for decision the question whether or not the trial judge should have granted a new trial upon the usual general grounds only. This case is an action for malicious prosecution. The facts are substantially the following: Homer Hunt was engaged in the retail jewelry business, and sold a certain ring to the plaintiff in error. The defendant in error was engaged in the operation of a collecting' agency. The retention-title contract held by Homer Hunt against the plaintiff in error for the ring was turned over to the defendant in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Associated Mutuals Inc. v. Pope Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Henderson v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. Sledge v. McLarenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  4. Scott v. GillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Brown v. Meador & GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Price v. Whitley Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  2. Lovinger v. PfefferCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Powell v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. M. & G. Textile Co. v. West Point-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Gilstrap v. GannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API