Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Potruff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

On October 31,1881, plaintiff and defendant were severally owners of undivided interests in a field of wheat on land occupied by them, and plaintiff gave defendant a bill of sale, whereby, for the expressed consideration of $275, he bargained, sold and conveyed his interest in the wheat to defendant, with warranty of title. The sum named as the consideration was duly paid. Afterwards plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit, claiming that, notwithstanding the bill of sale, he was entitled, by oral agreement made at the same time, to a portion of the wheat, in case the quantity, when harvested,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Picard v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Trevidick v. MumfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Rowe v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reeves & Co. v. BrueningNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Nebraska Land & Feeding Co. v. TrauermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API