Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Planters Warehouse Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1919No. 10319Published

Complaint; from Taylor superior court—Judge Howard. November 16, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

This was a suit against a married woman on a promissory note executed solely by her. She admitted the execution of the note, but pleaded that its sole consideration was indebtedness of her husband. The verdict was against her, and she excepts to the overruling of her motion for a new trial, based on the usual general grounds. Eeld-. While thg evidence was in sharp conflict, this court can not say that the jury were not authorized to And therefrom that the defendant’s husband acted as her agent (although this agency was denied by the defendant upon the trial) in the purchase of the goods for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. SheppardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Schofield v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Hill Bros. v. BazemoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API