Bailey v. Lakewood Fire Protection District
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RULAND, Judge.
We have consolidated these two cases for purpose of a written opinion. The sole issue in each appeal is the correct interpretation of § 8-51-101(l)(d), C.R.S.1973, of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, which provides for certain deductions when a claimant is entitled to both benefits under the Act and benefits from the disability provisions of his employer’s pension plan. We concur with the interpretation of the Industrial Commission as contained in its final orders.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. Petitioner Edward Bailey was employed by the respondent Lakewood Fire…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harding v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- People ex rel. Marks v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
3Cited by4 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. EdlundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Edlund v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Johnson v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Walker v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1994