Legal Opinion

Standard Accident Insurance v. Gore

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1954No. 4351PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The policy of insurance, which was issued to Mrs. Gore as named insured, provided that the word “insured” as used therein should include “any person while using the automobile . . . provided the actual use of the automobile is by the named insured or with his permission.” It bore a statutory motor vehicle endorsement incorporating by reference “all policy provisions required” by R. L., c. 122, as amended, which provides that such insurance shall apply “to any person who has obtained possession or control of the motor vehicle of the insured with his express or implied consent even though the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Randig v. O'Hara (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bourne Ex Rel. Bourne v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. New London v. LeskiewiczSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  4. Truck Insurance Exchange v. HuntMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. OliverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API