Legal Opinion

McCoy v. Lockridge

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1933No. 4-3188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). No notice of the dissolution of the corporation or the distribution of its assets among its stockholders was published by the Stuttgart Eice Mill Company; and it was admitted that appellee had no actual notice thereof, the agreed statement of facts containing the following stipulation: “No notice of the. dissolution of the corporation nor of the distribution of its assets among its stockholders was published by the Stuttgart Eice Mill Company; that after the rendition of the original decree in favor of Lozier Lockridge and before the filing of this cause…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TolerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Hirsch v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API