McCoy v. Lockridge
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). No notice of the dissolution of the corporation or the distribution of its assets among its stockholders was published by the Stuttgart Eice Mill Company; and it was admitted that appellee had no actual notice thereof, the agreed statement of facts containing the following stipulation: “No notice of the. dissolution of the corporation nor of the distribution of its assets among its stockholders was published by the Stuttgart Eice Mill Company; that after the rendition of the original decree in favor of Lozier Lockridge and before the filing of this cause…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TolerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Douglas v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Hirsch v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947