Legal Opinion

Wurtzel v. Falcey

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal derives from a declaratory judgment action in which plaintiffs-appellants challenged on equal protection grounds the minimum age requirements for certain elective offices in the New Jersey Constitution, which operated to deny them a place on the ballot in the 1973 general election. Art. IV, § I, ¶ 2 sets an age minimum of 21 years for members of the Assembly and 30 years for State Senators. When they attempted to run, none of the named plaintiffs was over 19 years of age, hence none would have been able to meet these age minima. The State’s motion for summary judgment was granted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. American Party of Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. TAXPAYERS ASSN. OF WEYMOUTH TP. INC. v. Weymouth Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. State v. MustoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Matthews v. City of AtLantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Berberian v. PetitSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API