Legal Opinion
National Treasury Employees Union v. United States Customs Service
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 1, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-2761PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
In December, 1992, the defendant United States Customs Service (“Customs”) announced its intention to implement a new drug-screening program under which an expanded class of Customs employees with access to certain computer files will be required to submit to random periodic urinalyses to detect the presence of controlled substances. See generally Department of the Treasury, U.S. Customs Service, Draft Directive re: Drug-Free Federal Workplace Program (1992) [hereinafter “Draft Directive”]. The plaintiff National Treasury Employees Union (“NTEU”),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. RaabCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union Paul R. Anuschat Catharine E. Bogikes v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- National Treasury Employees Union v. U.S. Department of TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- National Treasury Employees Union Paul R. Anuschat Catharine E. Bogikes v. United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994