Legal Opinion

In Re Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing Severally to Policy No. THM000938-01 v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided July 11, 2025No. 13-25-00088-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-25-00088-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING SEVERALLY TO POLICY NO. THM000938-01 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Fonseca Opinion by Chief Justice Tijerina1 By petition for writ of mandamus, relators Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London Subscribing Severally to Policy No. THM000938-01 (Underwriters) contend that the trial 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jennifer Gasch and Tammy Gasch, as Next Friend to Z.G., a Minor v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Karen FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Garrison Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API