Legal Opinion

Stetson v. Riggs

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1893No. 4921PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below before Hall, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

One Stetson conveyed two lots in Lincoln, Nebraska, to one Riggs, in exchange for a stock of drugs. One of the lots conveyed'was incumbered by a mortgage of $700, previously executed by Stetson to other parties, which mortgage Riggs assumed. * On the maturity of the mortgage Stetson advanced the money, took an assignment of it, and brought this suit to foreclose it. Riggs filed an answer, the substance of which is as follows: “And for further answer this defendant says that said described real estate was conveyed to the defendant by the plaintiff in a transaction of barter and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Taylor v. . GuestNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Humphrey v. MerriamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Clark v. TennantNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Runge v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
  5. White v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Peterson v. SchabergNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Butte Hardware Co. v. KnoxMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Nelson v. GrondahlNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Dyck v. SnyggNebraska Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API