Legal Opinion

Hart v. Little

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action for a permanent injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

The suit, is "brought to enforce through the medium of a permanent injunction a restrictive covenant as to the use of real property. Plaintiff and defendant are the owners of contiguous properties, and derived their titles from the same common owner through mesne conveyances. The relation of the two parcels is shown on the following diagram:

Bach property was conveyed by the Manor Realty Company by a deed containing covenants as to the *622character and use of buildings which should be erected upon the property. These covenants are in practically identical form, so far as they apply to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Kingsland v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Beach v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Levy v. Halcyon Casino Hotel Co.New York Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Goodhue v. PennellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HensleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Bouvier v. SegardiNew York Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Marsh v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Guthrie v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API