Legal Opinion
Pace v. . Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 30, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Separate actions upon two policies of insurance issued by defendant upon the life of William H. Pace, now deceased, were consolidated for trial. Under instructions from the court there was verdict for defendant, and from judgment thereon plaintiff appealed. The proofs were entirely documentary and there was no controversy as to the material facts. The questions at issue involved the construction of insurance contracts between insured and defendant, and the legal effect of the failure of the insured to pay the premiums on the policies since 26 August, 1921. The only exception noted by the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wilkie v. New York Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- McCampbell v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- McConnell v. Provident Savings Life Assur. Soc. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Stramback v. Fidelity Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Wilkinson v. Commonwealth Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Lentin v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
- Brooks v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Cananwill, Inc. v. EMAR Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Middle Georgia Neurological Specialists, P.C., Cross-Appellants v. Southwestern Life Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.