Legal Opinion

Maltman v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 23, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. John P. Altgeld, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMobatj, P. J.

This action was brought by appellant to recover from appellee damages alleged to have been sustained by him as the owner of some sixteen lots fronting on what is known as Bloomingdale Road, upon which road the defendant has built and is operating a railroad. When the evidence had been all introduced, the court instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant.

As we understand the record, this action of the court is based upon two grounds: First, that as the ordinance which authorized defendant to enter on and occupy said Bloomingdale Road, authorized the laying of .two tracks, and as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pittsburg, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railroad v. ReichIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. McDougallIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co. v. MorawetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Maltman v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul R. R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API