Legal Opinion
In Re Settlement of Underwood
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1950No. 35,118PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
231 Minn. 144 (1950)
IN RE SETTLEMENT OF OLIVE UNDERWOOD.
VILLAGE OF LESTER PRAIRIE
v.
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND CITY OF WATERVILLE.
COUNTY OF FREEBORN, APPELLANT.[1]
No. 35,118.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 5, 1950.
Rudolph Hanson, County Attorney, for appellant.
Elmer C. Jensen, for respondent Village of Lester Prairie.
Gallagher, Madden & Sheran, for respondent City of Waterville.
MAGNEY, JUSTICE.
In an action to determine the legal settlement for purposes of poor relief of one Olive Underwood, the court determined that the county of Freeborn was the place of such settlement. The county appeals from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kiebach v. KiebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- City of Minneapolis v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Village of Lester Prairie v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- In Re Settlement of PeniondtzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
3Cited by2 opinions
- Distillers Distributing Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014