Legal Opinion

Matter of Stone Creek Channel Improvements

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1988No. Civ. No. 870247PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

424 N.W.2d 894 (1988)

In the Matter of The Application for PERMITS TO DRAIN RELATED TO STONE CREEK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS AND WHITE SPUR DRAIN.

BOTTINEAU COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT and State Engineer, Appellants,

v.

NORTH DAKOTA WILDLIFE SOCIETY, Appellee.

Civ. No. 870247.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 16, 1988.

Zuger, Bolinske & Smith, Bismarck, for appellant Bottineau County Water Resource Dist.; argued by Murray G. Sagaveen, Bismarck.

Rosellen M. Sand (argued), Water Com'n, Bismarck, for appellant State Engineer.

Wheeler, Wolf, Peterson, Schmitz, McDonald & Johnson, Bismarck, for appellee;…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Payne v. KassabCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. First American Bank & Trust Company v. EllweinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Schadler v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Nelson v. South Dakota State Board of DentistrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. North Dakota Securities Commissioner v. Juran & Moody, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hanson v. Industrial Commission of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. McCarter v. PomeroyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Walton v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API