Lassiter v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHoke, C. J.
In the location of route No. 90 of the State highway system, running from Raleigh through Wake County and into the eastern section of the State, there were two routes suggested and available between Raleigh and the town of Wendell, about 18 miles east — one known locally as the Milburnie route, and the other the Pool route— both being public highways, for the repair and maintenance of which the county of Wake is responsible. From a perusal of the pleadings and affidavits it reasonably and satisfactorily appears that while the two routes are about the same distance, the upkeep and maintenance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Columbia Wire Co. v. BoyceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Woodall v. Western Wake Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- State v. IngersollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Town of Murphy v. C. A. Webb & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- State v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers & Merchants Bank v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Young v. . Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Coburn v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Johnson v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Oliver v. . Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.