Legal Opinion

State v. . Black

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 8, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Without deciding whether the whole of sec. 6, ch. 228, Public Laws 1933, was intended to be repealed by ch. 432, Public Laws 1937, we think the power of the court to enter judgment in the case must be upheld on authority of what was said in S. v. Bradshaw, 214 N. C., 5, 197 S. E., 564. The defendant’s plea of “guilty” presupposes the necessary disposition of matters required to establish his willful neglect or refusal to support the- child in question.

Having admitted his guilt, the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment was properly denied. S. v. McKnight, 196 N. C., 259, 145 S. E., 281.

A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. State v. . McKnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. State v. . BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. . BradleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . McKeonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API