Legal Opinion

State v. . Bradshaw

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stagy, O. J.

It was held in S. v. Mansfield, 207 N. C., 233, 176 S.E., 761, that a judgment under the prior bastardy statutes after their repeal by ch. 228, Public Laws 1933, and with which the defendant had failed to comply, would not defeat a proceeding under the latter act.

It was also held in S. v. Johnson, 212 N. C., 566, that the offense created by ch. 228, Public Laws of 1933, is a continuing one, and that a prior proceeding would not defeat si subsequent one for a later violation.

In the instant case, the plea is interposed that the proceeding is barred by section 3 of the act which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. State v. . MansfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. . HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. State v. . Perry (Guion)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. State v. . DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . KillianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API