State v. . Bradshaw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stagy, O. J.
It was held in S. v. Mansfield, 207 N. C., 233, 176 S.E., 761, that a judgment under the prior bastardy statutes after their repeal by ch. 228, Public Laws 1933, and with which the defendant had failed to comply, would not defeat a proceeding under the latter act.
It was also held in S. v. Johnson, 212 N. C., 566, that the offense created by ch. 228, Public Laws of 1933, is a continuing one, and that a prior proceeding would not defeat si subsequent one for a later violation.
In the instant case, the plea is interposed that the proceeding is barred by section 3 of the act which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- State v. . MansfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. . HedgepethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- State v. . Perry (Guion)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . DillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . KillianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.