Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Benenson Management Co. v. Banner Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 20, 1961Published

1Concurrence

Rabin, J. (concurring in result).

While I concur in the result reached by the court, I do not rest my vote for reversal on the ground relied upon by the majority. I do not believe that at this juncture the brokerage agreement and its “ waiver ” provisions constitute a complete defense to this action. While the brokerage agreement here is identical with that presented in Wenger v. Lefrak (279 App. Div. 993, affd. 305 N. Y. 656) there is a most important distinction between the two eases. In the Wenger ease the default of the seller was postcontract, whereas in the instant case no contract was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heller & Henretig, Inc. v. 3620-168th Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Wenger v. LefrakNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Wenger v. LefrakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API