Legal Opinion

Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 2, 2017No. NUMBER 13-16-00248-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice Contreras

In this permissive appeal, we are asked whether appellant Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP (“Burlington”) may deduct post-production expenses from overriding royalty payments made under certain assignment instruments. The trial court concluded that the assignments did not allow for the deduction of post-production expenses and it rendered summary judgment in favor of appellees Texas Crude Energy, LLC (“Texas Crude”) and Amber Harvest, LLC (“Amber”). We affirm.

I. Background

In 2004, Burlington and Texas Crude entered into a Prospect Development…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. FieldingTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Byron D. Neely, Individually, and Byron D. Neely, M.D., P.A. v. Nanci Wilson, CBS Stations Group of Texas, L.P., D/B/A Keye-Tv and Viacom, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company Lp v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC and Amber Harvest, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API