Bradley v. Thixton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Elliott, C. J. —
Sarah Durnil was the wife of Bryson A. Durnil. He became the owner of the real estate in controversy during the lifetime of his wife, and mortgaged it to Henry J. Prier, but the wife did not join in the mortgage. A suit for foreclosure was instituted against the mortgagor, and a decree foreclosing the mortgage was rendered. The wife was not a party to this suit. In 1877 the land was sold on the decree. Bryson A. Durnil abandoned his wife and lived in adultery with a woman named Dewey. He was living in adultery with this woman at the time of his wife’s death, which occurred in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Robertson v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Robinson v. RippeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Morrison v. JacobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rushville Gas Co. v. City of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Walgreen Co. v. Gross Income Tax DivisionIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Ribelin v. PeughIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Gaddis v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
- Gaddis v. Board, Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1932