Legal Opinion
Continental Ins. Co. v. Paccar, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1981No. 47400-1PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this case an insured seeks review of a
Court of Appeals decision holding that an "annual retained aggregate" liability in an insurance policy should not have been prorated when the insurer cancelled the policy before expiration of the annual period. Continental Ins. Co. v. Paccar, Inc., 26 Wn. App. 850, 614 P.2d 675 (1980). We reverse.
In 1974, respondent Continental Insurance Company (Continental) issued Paccar, Inc. (Paccar), the petitioner, an insurance policy that commenced March 1, 1974, and that was effective "until cancelled." Under the policy, Paccar received $1 million in coverage…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dairyland Insurance v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Shotwell v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Witherspoon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Muench v. OxleyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Ryan v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Denny's Restaurants, Inc. v. Security Union Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.