Amick v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.
Jeffrey Amick appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for limited driving privileges pursuant to section 302.309.1 Amick asserts that section 302.309.3(6)(b) violates the equal protection clause because the statute disqualifies individuals with a felony conviction involving a motor vehicle from obtaining limited driving privileges. Amick’s equal protection argument is premised on a comparison with section 302.309.3(9), which allows graduates of, or participants in, statutorily authorized DWI court divisions or programs to obtain such privileges. Amick asserts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Fust v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Stewart v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Weinschenk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Douglas Cosby v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- William Dieser, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. St. Anthony's Medical Center, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
- Linda Labrayere as Trustee of the Don E. Labrayere Trust v. Bohr Farms, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Hill v. AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Douglas Cosby v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.