Legal Opinion

Amick v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 2014No. SC 93742PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Jeffrey Amick appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for limited driving privileges pursuant to section 302.309.1 Amick asserts that section 302.309.3(6)(b) violates the equal protection clause because the statute disqualifies individuals with a felony conviction involving a motor vehicle from obtaining limited driving privileges. Amick’s equal protection argument is premised on a comparison with section 302.309.3(9), which allows graduates of, or participants in, statutorily authorized DWI court divisions or programs to obtain such privileges. Amick asserts…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Fust v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Stewart v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Weinschenk v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  5. State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Douglas Cosby v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
  2. William Dieser, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. St. Anthony's Medical Center, Appellant/Cross-Respondent.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  3. Linda Labrayere as Trustee of the Don E. Labrayere Trust v. Bohr Farms, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. Hill v. AshcroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Douglas Cosby v. Treasurer of the State of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API