Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Boysa v. Fritz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 8, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
At an early day this court held that 'it was the general policy of the law to allow a party against whom judicial proceedings were commenced to stay proceedings under the decision of an inferior tribunal against him, from which he has appealed, on giving just and adequate security. Hudson v. Smith, 9 Wis. 122. This court said, on p. 127:
“There are many authorities which hold a different doctrine, some of which were cited on the argument. But if in this conflict we look at the nature and object of an appeal, it seems to us that these support the rule that it works a stay of proceedings. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Park Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Hudson v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- City of Janesville v. Janesville Water Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
- Milwaukee Corrugating Co. v. FlaggeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Hill v. Gates CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carpenter Baking Co. v. Bakery Sales Drivers Local Union No. 344Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Department of Agriculture v. MarriottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940