Milwaukee Corrugating Co. v. Flagge
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
It has been held that it is the general policy of the law to allow any party against whom judicial proceedings are commenced to stay proceedings under the decision of any inferior tribunal against him, from which he has appealed, on giving just and adequate security. Hudson v. Smith, 9 Wis. 122; Northwestern Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. Park Hotel Co. 37 Wis. 125.
It has also been held that appeals from orders and judgments, in the cases allowed by law, are a matter of right; arid within the limitation that the appeal is taken and prosecuted in good faith, and that the party asking it gives the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- My Laundry Co. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Weinhagen v. HayesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Park Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Hudson v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
- State ex rel. Thompson v. Board of School DirectorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shorewood School Dist. v. Wausau Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Muscoda Bridge Co. v. Worden Allen Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Town of Seaford v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
- Calmenson Clothing Co. v. KrugerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- School District v. Wausau InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.