Legal Opinion

Boxx v. Bennett

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 18, 1999No. Civil Action 98-A-1280-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1221 MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALBRITTON, Chief District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This three-judge court has been convened to hear a case implicating the pre-clearance mandate of section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973c. The Plaintiffs in this action are registered voters in Jefferson County. They contend that § 307-X-1-.21 of the amended Procedures for Electronic Vote Counting Systems, which allows for a recounting of votes under certain circumstances, cannot be implemented because Alabama failed to obtain proper preclearance under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Perkins v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Presley v. Etowah County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Morse v. Republican Party of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. City of Lockhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connors v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
  2. Kennedy v. RileyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2006
  3. Boxx v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  4. Connors v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
  5. Connors v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API