Alameda Park Co. v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
The deficiency herein for the year 1917 is barred by the statute of limitations.
1Opinion of the Court
ALAMEDA PARK COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.
Alameda Park Co. v. Commissioner
Docket No. 8355.
United States Board of Tax Appeals
25 B.T.A. 850; 1932 BTA LEXIS 1466;
March 11, 1932, Promulgated
The deficiency herein for the year 1917 is barred by the statute of limitations.
George E. H. Goodner, Esq., for the petitioner.
W. Frank Gibbs, Esq., for the respondent.
LOVE
This proceeding, which involves a deficiency for the calendar year 1917, was previously before the Board on its merits, a report of which is published at 10 B.T.A. 1115. Later the Court of Appeals of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Farmers Feed Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Bonwit Teller & Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.