Legal Opinion
Morkel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided November 29, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
We think the provision against assignment of the policy was plain and unambiguous, and must be enforced as written. (Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co., 144 Misc. 70; affd., 238 App. Div. 82; Heffernan v. Prudential Insurance Co., 88 Misc. 93.)
Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
- Sacks v. Neptune Meter Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Heffernan v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Standard Discount Co. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944
- Lain v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944