Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1972No. 44848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the possession of heroin; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.

The appellant’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief which raises no ground of error and states “Counsel further finds there is no other error upon which a non-frivolous appeal might be based.” The record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. Calfornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Ex parte GrantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API