Ramirez v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for the possession of heroin; the punishment, ten years imprisonment.
The appellant’s court-appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief which raises no ground of error and states “Counsel further finds there is no other error upon which a non-frivolous appeal might be based.” The record does not reflect that a copy of the brief was served upon the appellant as is required by Anders v. Calfornia, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App.1969); Holder v. State, 469 S.W.2d 184…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gainous v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Holder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Ex parte GrantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972