Legal Opinion

Schornhorst v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 5, 2009No. Case 07-cv-12700PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MUTUAL OF OMAHA’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ON THE RECORD, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT ON THE RECORD, AND GRANTING DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This ERISA denial of benefits case is presently before the Court on Cross-Motions filed by Defendant Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company and Plaintiff Jennifer Schornhorst, respectively, requesting affirmance and reversal of the administrative decision denying Ms. Schornhorst’s request for accidental death…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Willis Hope White v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Grindstaff v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Concordia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Method Pharmaceuticals, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
  2. Butler v. FCA US, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
  3. Cornish v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009
  4. Richards v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2010
  5. Atrium Medical Center v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API