Legal Opinion
Fontenot v. Patterson Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 18, 2009No. 06-1624, 06-1625PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
11 These consolidated actions are again before us, this time on remand from the supreme court. When these matters were first before us, we attempted to reconcile conflicting decisions rendered by the jury and the trial court in a bifurcated trial by performing a de novo review of the record. Fontenot v. Patterson Ins. Co., 06-1624, 06-1625 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/5/07), 972 So.2d 401. One of the defendants, the State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD), filed an application for supervisory writs with the supreme court questioning whether this court applied the proper…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- Clement v. FreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Toston v. PardonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fontenot v. Patterson InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
- Louisiana Mobile Imaging, Inc. v. Ralph L. Abraham, Jr., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Brooks v. City of LafayetteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Comeaux v. Acadia Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Fontenot v. Patterson InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.