Legal Opinion
Sarlat v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided May 12, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
These proceedings illustrate the vice in using in this court a printed form designed for giving notice in matters falling within the purview of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law and similar statutes. As a result, the attention of the draftsman is diverted from the rule that a claim in the Court of Claims is a pleading which must allege material facts and not mere conclusions of law.
This is a motion for an order directing that the notice of intention previously filed be deemed a claim. Alternatively, permission to file a late claim is sought.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Sauter v. New York Tribune, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Heisler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Harvey Chalmers & Son, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Cornell v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Masters v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berger v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Ciferri v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Chung v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1984
- Dunckley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1987