Legal Opinion
Shah v. Harding
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 5, 2003No. 3D02-1598PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
839 So.2d 765 (2003)
Karla SHAH, Appellant,
v.
Maria-Elena B. HARDING, Appellee.
No. 3D02-1598.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 5, 2003.
Clarification Denied March 12, 2003.
Billbrough & Marks, and G. Bart Billbrough, Miami, for appellant.
Buchbinder & Elegant, and Harris J. Buchbinder, Miami, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ.
2Per curiam
Appellant, Karla Shah ("Shah"), seeks a new trial based upon the trial court's denial of her motion to recuse the trial judge. We reverse because the trial judge failed to follow the proper procedure in consideration of a recusal…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Fuster-Escalona v. WisotskySupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Florida Bar Re: Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial AdministrationSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
4Cited by4 opinions
- Valdes-Fauli v. Valdes-FauliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Hoffman v. CrosbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Valdes-Fauli v. Valdes-FauliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005