Legal Opinion

Fortino v. Quasar Company

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 3, 1991No. 91-1123PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

950 F.2d 389

57 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 712,

57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,117, 21 Fed.R.Serv.3d 127

John FORTINO, Carl Meyers, and F. William Schulz,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

v.

QUASAR COMPANY, A DIVISION OF MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC

CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 91-1123, 91-1197 and 91-1564.

United States Court of Appeals,

Seventh Circuit.

Argued Oct. 15, 1991.

Decided Dec. 3, 1991.

Steven L. Bashwiner, Brian W. Bulger, Timothy J. Patenode, Gail C. Kalinich, Katten, Muchin & Zavis, Chicago, Ill., Paul L. Bressan, argued, Kelley, Drye & Warren, Los Angeles, Cal.,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. Pharmacia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Franchina v. Providence Fire DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. Nyunt v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  4. Williams v. Pharmacia Opthalmics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
  5. A.O.A. v. RennertDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API