Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1941No. 32,933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

In a suit to compel specific performance of an oral contract to make a will, the court found “that plaintiff has failed to prove the agreement alleged in * * * his complaint or any other en forceable agreement by the kind and character of evidence which is required by law,” and hence that “there was no such agreement” made. Judgment of dismissal was directed, later entered, and plaintiff appeals.

The parties to this suit are the children of John A. and Mary Carlson. The mother died intestate in 1919 possessed of an 80-acre homestead, appraised value $10,000. She ivas…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carlson v. KrantzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Jannetta v. JannettaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Brasch v. ReevesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Hauge v. NordinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christie v. EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. McCarty v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. HeitzDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  4. Zuelch v. DroegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Consolidated Elevator Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API