Legal Opinion

Scofield v. Lilienthal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1925No. 159PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGallagher, C. J.

Appellees Julius H. Lilienthal and Chas. A. Lilienthal, composing the firm of Lilienthal Brost, sued appellant, Frank Scofield, in the county court to recover on a verified account amounting in the aggregate to $245.60. The trial was before the court. Judgment was rendered in favor of appellees against appellant for the amount sued for. The ease is before us on appeal.

Appellees ask us to refuse to consider appellant’s propositions of law and the assignments of error on which the same are based, because no motion for a new trial was filed and no conclusions of law and fact appear in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Craver v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Moore v. Powers BrothersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Maverick v. MauryTexas Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meaders v. BiskampTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Central Nat. Bank of San Angelo v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Unit, Inc. v. Ten Eyck-Shaw, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Eastern Development & Investment Corp. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Whitson v. Wetherbee Electric CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API