Legal Opinion
Trianco, LLC v. International Business Machines Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 2, 2008No. 07-1095PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUENTES, Circuit Judge:
Presently before the Court is Trianco, LLC’s (“Trianco”) appeal of the dismissal of its complaint against International Business Machine Corporation (“IBM”) under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, we will affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand with instructions.
I
In early 2005, the federal Defense Commissary Agency (the “Government”) issued a “request for proposal” (“RFP”) seeking bids for a prime contract to install computerized “point-of-sale” checkstand equip*200ment at the approximately 280 military commissaries…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- EBC I, Inc. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Joseph Martin, Jr., Delicatessen, Inc. v. SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Winer Family Trust v. QueenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Goldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Richbell Information Services, Inc. v. Jupiter Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Foros Advisors LLC v. Digital Globe, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Cyberlock Consulting, Inc. v. Information Experts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Delta Electric v. BiggsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2011
- Trianco, LLC v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Halperin v. Moreno (In re Green Field Energy Servs., Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.