Legal Opinion

Amato v. Hartnett

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 30, 2013No. 09-cv-9511 (ER)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RAMOS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carl Amato (“Plaintiff’ or “Amato”), a former Detention Officer for the City of Yonkers (the “City”), brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *423§ 1983 against .the City and various employees of the City Police Department and the City Courts and Detention Services Division (collectively, the “Defendants”), alleging violations of Plaintiffs First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendment rights, as well as conspiracy to deprive Plaintiff of his constitutional rights, and a state law claim for conversion for Defendants’ continued…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schoolcraft v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  2. Ratajack v. Brewster Fire Department, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Pierre v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  4. Accardi v. County of SuffolkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
  5. Haughey v. County of PutnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API