Legal Opinion
Baxa Corp. v. McGaw, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided January 23, 1998No. Civil Action 92-B-80, 96-B-1207PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Excelsior Medical Corporation (Excelsior) asserts identical claims in 92-B-80 and counterclaims in 96-13-1207 for antitrust violations and four state-law-based torts. Baxa Corporation (Baxa) moves for summary judgment on all five claims and counterclaims (hereinafter, “claims”), reasons, I will grant Baxa’s motions. For the following
I
The following facts are undisputed or, if disputed, are viewed in a light most favorable to Excelsior. In 1992, Baxa initiated an action (92-B-80) for patent infringement against Excelsior and McGaw, Inc. (McGaw). In its Second…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- David L. White v. York International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schecher v. Purdue Pharma L.P.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Openwater Safety IV, LLC v. Great Lakes Insurance, SEDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020