Legal Opinion

Maine Education Ass'n Benefits Trust v. Cioppa

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 3, 2012No. 1:11-cv-381-GZSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (Docket # 30). For the reasons explained herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) tests the “legal sufficiency” of a complaint. Gomes v. Univ. of Me. Sys., 304 F.Supp.2d 117, 120 (D.Me.2004). The general rules of pleading require a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). This short and plain statement…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. AES Puerto Rico, L.P. v. Trujillo-PanisseDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2016
  2. BIRCH v. ETHICON INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
  3. BLAIS v. ETHICON INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
  4. CORINTH PELLETS LLC v. ANDRITZ INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
  5. COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE v. QUINLANDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API