Legal Opinion

State v. Carlson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1933No. 5972PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWernette, J.

Appellants were convicted of the crime of forgery and have perfected an appeal to this court. The information charges:

“The said A. C. Carlson, otherwise known as Jack Cline, and Malcolm Bentley on or about the seventh day of May, 1932, at the county of Bingham, and the State of Idaho, and prior to the filing of this information, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, knowingly, falsely, and fraudulently, and with intent to prejudice, damage and defraud J. N. McCracken stores of Blaekfoot, Idaho, make, alter, forge, and counterfeit a certain instrument in writing, in the words…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. McClurgIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. MarcoeIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State v. McDermottIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. MonteithIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Broshears v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. LinebargerIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. SalhusIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. ConstanzoIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API